حسابداری و بودجه‌ریزی بخش عمومی

حسابداری و بودجه‌ریزی بخش عمومی

شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی پیشران‌های مسئولیت‌پذیری و پاسخگویی حسابداران بخش عمومی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه حسابداری، واحد زاهدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زاهدان، ایران
2 گروه مالی و حسابداری، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه میبد، میبد، ایران
10.22034/psab.2026.247877
چکیده
The present study aimed to identify and rank the drivers of responsibility and accountability of public sector accountants. In terms of approach, this study is an exploratory mixed-method research design (qualitative-quantitative). In the qualitative phase, a systematic review of the literature and interviews with experts were conducted to identify the drivers of responsibility and accountability of public sector accountants. Interviews were conducted with 15 experts in the field of public sector accounting using purposive sampling. In the quantitative phase, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed to rank the identified drivers. The statistical population in this phase included all employees of the financial and accounting units of government organizations in Tehran, from whom 384 participants were selected through simple random sampling and the questionnaire was distributed among them. Accordingly, it was clarified that the present study was conducted in the public sector of Iran, specifically in government organizations located in Tehran and their financial and accounting units. To remove any ambiguity, it was also explained that this setting was chosen due to the central role of these units in collecting, processing, and reporting financial information, as well as their importance in promoting financial responsibility and accountability. The collected data formed the basis for analysis and prioritization of the drivers of responsibility and accountability. The results showed that the drivers of responsibility and accountability of public sector accountants include active accountability of the government accountant, technological and information factors, traceable transparency of financial information, knowledge factors and organizational learning, independence accompanied by responsibility, transparency and enforceability of financial laws, accountants’ operational independence in implementing the law, individual commitment to professional responsibility, incentives and penalties related to accountability, instability and complexity of financial regulations, cultural-managerial factors, intensity of external oversight, strengthening auditing and professional ethics, clarification of roles and responsibilities, authority, security and institutional support, reduction of corruption and financial risk, integration of financial processes, operational efficiency, broader accountability, and trust and transparency. Among these, active accountability, information technology, financial transparency, organizational learning, and responsible independence received the highest priority.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

Agostino, D., Bracci, E., Cruz, I., Jorge, S., Cardoso, R. L., & Lourenço, R. (2023). Debate: Data science challenges to financial information in the public sector. Public Money & Management, 43(8), 773–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2221526
Alamaa, L., Hall, P. & Löfgren, K. (2024). Why are organisational professionals expanding in the Swedish public sector? The role of accountability. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767241227068
Darabi, R., & Dolatshahi, M. (2025). The effect of artificial intelligence on budgeting optimization and financial forecasting accuracy in management accounting: A case study of manufacturing companies in Tehran Province. Strategic Management Accounting, 2(2), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.22034/smajournal.2025.518968.1014 (in Persian)
Dash, T., & Sahoo, C. K. (2025). Indian mining industry: exploring the significance of social audit in fostering sustainable corporate social responsibility. Social Responsibility Journal, 21(3), 640-666.‌ https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2024-0020
Dewi, N., Azam, S., & Yusoff, S. (2019). Factors influencing the information quality of local government financial statement and financial accountability. Management Science Letters, 9(9), 1373–1384. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.5.013
Jimenez-Gomez, C. E., Cano-Carrillo, J., & Lanas, F. F. (2020). Artificial intelligence in government. Computer, 53(10), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2020.3010043
Karimi, M. A., Kordestani, G., & Biglar, K. (2023). Identifying improvement opportunities in the public financial management system. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 10(1), 61–96. https://doi.org/10.30479/jfak.2023.18308.3062 (in Persian)
Lehner, O. M., Ittonen, K., Silvola, H., Ström, E., & Wührleitner, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence based decision-making in accounting and auditing: Ethical challenges and normative thinking. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2020-4934
Lewis, M. K. (2001). Islam and accounting. Accounting Forum, 25(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6303.00058
Mashayekhi, B., Samavat, M., & Jahangard, A. (2023). A review of public sector internal auditing research: A bibliometric analysis. Governmental Accounting Journal, 9(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.30473/gaa.2023.67440.1648 (in Persian)
Piri, H., Mehrabinia, R., & Moradgholi, J. (2024). Identification of operational accountability drivers in the public sector within Islamic environments. Accounting, Auditing and Financing in Islamic Environments, 2(6), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.22034/aafie.2024.463867.1043 (in Persian)
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
Schillemans, T. (2008). Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: The horizontal accountability of agencies. Public Organization Review, 8(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0053-8
Sotudeh, R., & Barahooey Pirnia, B. (2025). Explaining the transparency model of financial reporting in the country's public sector based on accrual accounting. Public Sector Accounting and Budgeting, 6(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.22034/psab.2025.223195 (in Persian)
Sotudeh, R., Haghparast, A., & Hirad, A. (2025a). Management Accounting and Resilience Economics Model for Sustainable Development of Manufacturing Companies. Strategic Management Accounting, 1(1), 40-64. https://doi.org/10.22034/smajournal.2025.511901.1003 (in Persian)
Sotudeh, R., Haghparast, A., & Hirad, A. (2025b). Financial accountability model of public sector financial managers. Public Sector Accounting and Budgeting, 6(2), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.22034/psab.2025.219284 (in Persian)
Wang, O., Wu, H., & Li, C. (2025). Corporate social responsibility performance and litigation risk. Finance Research Letters, 72, 106584.‌https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106584

  • تاریخ دریافت 24 فروردین 1405
  • تاریخ بازنگری 07 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 25 خرداد 1405